shouze
Repos
7
Followers
107
Following
41

Composite github action to sparse checkout a repository.

2
0

Composite github action to prepare a terraform plan for review into a pull request.

1
1

Prepare everything needed for a Nodejs app in a monorepo (cache, dependencies, ...)

1
0

Composite github action to setup terraform.

1
1

Events

issue comment
Styled components not working after upgrading 1.5.45 → 1.5.48

Not webpack.

Created at 1 week ago
issue comment
Styled components not working after upgrading 1.5.45 → 1.5.48

Ok so false signal, looks like related to another dependency upgrade (webpack or swc, I'm investigating).

Created at 1 week ago
opened issue
Styled components not working after upgrading 1.5.45 → 1.5.48

Here's the output I get into vercel build:

./src/pages/_app.page.tsx
Error: failed to process failed to invoke plugin: failed to invoke plugin on 'Some("/home/runner/work/guest-journey/guest-journey/internet-booking-engine/src/pages/_app.page.tsx")'

Caused by:
    0: failed to invoke `/home/runner/work/guest-journey/guest-journey/internet-booking-engine/node_modules/@swc/plugin-styled-components/swc_plugin_styled_components.wasm` as js transform plugin at /home/runner/work/guest-journey/guest-journey/internet-booking-engine/node_modules/@swc/plugin-styled-components/swc_plugin_styled_components.wasm
    1: RuntimeError: out of bounds memory access
           at <unnamed> (<module>[3481]:0x121cad)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[3388]:0x116057)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[1829]:0xbf0c7)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[1841]:0xbfcb6)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[1840]:0xbfb85)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[1868]:0xc11b3)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[1867]:0xc0f85)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[333]:0x434e3)
           at <unnamed> (<module>[3680]:0x13178d)
    2: heap_get_oob
Created at 1 week ago
Merge the ARM Docker images into the existing images (multi-platform images)

Well, yes users will build their own image when deploying docker image so the image they will build will be mono arch by default (because new image build means new docker manifest from scratch).

Created at 1 week ago
Merge the ARM Docker images into the existing images

@mnapoli you also have the option to use docker manifest create.

An example: https://stackoverflow.com/a/70306574

So the idea would be to keep building separately tagged images (eg php-82-x86, php-82-arm64). Then triggering a manifest create workflow dispatch at the end of any build workflow of a given arch.

The manifest create workflow should be able to gently fail depending of the builds race condition. But when it is triggered at the time you have all archs images built & tagged, then you're ready to merge then thanks to docker manifest create command and then push them.

Final note: in fact when you trigger the manifest create github action workflow, best option is to pass docker image couple of unique hashs, not named tags.

Created at 1 week ago
issue comment
ARM64/Graviton support

Docker automatically pulls the right arch:

Yes but that's what I wanted to avoid, because you'd be working locally with the ARM image and deploying to x86 Lambda.

@mnapoli I'm not agree. It's nice & docker-ish way to have multi arch support for a given image, and under the same tag. Tag names shouldn't be used to specify an arch. In the same time, it's the team decision to choose if depending of the local development/developer laptop arch, you want to force to use a sticky arch or let docker dynamically use x86 or arm64 depending of the arch of this developer laptop. And it works by design into docker.

For example, in docker-compose.yaml:

  1. If you want to pin the platform:
version: '3.9'
   services:
      foo:
         platform: linux/amd64
         image: bref/php:82
         
  1. If you want to let docker dynamically use the platform of developer laptop (if arch is available in docker multi arch image):
version: '3.9'
   services:
      foo:
         platform: linux/amd64
         image: bref/php:82
         
Created at 2 weeks ago

deps(bref): upgrade (#74)

Signed-off-by: Sébastien HOUZÉ sebastien.houze@gogaille.fr

Created at 3 weeks ago
delete branch
shouze delete branch deps(bref)-upgrade
Created at 3 weeks ago
pull request closed
deps(bref): upgrade
Created at 3 weeks ago
pull request opened
deps(bref): upgrade
Created at 3 weeks ago
create branch
shouze create branch deps(bref)-upgrade
Created at 3 weeks ago
issue comment
A build error with Next.js

@thekip experimenting same issue, just updated the plugin.

Created at 1 month ago
delete branch
shouze delete branch deps(bref)-upgrade-1
Created at 1 month ago

deps(bref): upgrade (#73)

  • deps(bref): upgrade

Signed-off-by: Sébastien HOUZÉ sebastien.houze@gogaille.fr

  • rollback hcl2jon upgrade

Signed-off-by: Sébastien HOUZÉ sebastien.houze@gogaille.fr


Signed-off-by: Sébastien HOUZÉ sebastien.houze@gogaille.fr

Created at 1 month ago
pull request closed
deps(bref): upgrade
Created at 1 month ago
delete branch
shouze delete branch chore-update-bref
Created at 1 month ago
delete branch
shouze delete branch deps(bref)-upgrade
Created at 1 month ago

rollback hcl2jon upgrade

Signed-off-by: Sébastien HOUZÉ sebastien.houze@gogaille.fr

Created at 1 month ago
pull request opened
deps(bref): upgrade
Created at 1 month ago
create branch
shouze create branch deps(bref)-upgrade-1
Created at 1 month ago
Created at 1 month ago
started
Created at 1 month ago
fix: Unpack HandlerFailedException

@mnapoli I can confirm, previous PR wasn't sufficient, will perfectly work as expected with this patch.

Created at 1 month ago